Contact

Press, editorial, advisory, licensing, and reader correspondence all route through one address.

The pseudonymous discipline on author identities is permanent. Identity-confirmation questions about the authors go unanswered; the book is intended to stand on its argument, not on who wrote it.

What’s useful to send

Data corrections. If a figure in the book or on the site is wrong, please write — with the source you’re correcting against. Corrections land in the updates log. The /corrections/ page explains the institutional-priority routing for flags from official addresses.
New paradoxes you’ve documented. The paradox catalogue grows as new structural patterns are identified. Send the contrast in two numbers and the source.
Cases from inside the institutions. If a chapter describes a pattern you live inside professionally, your read on what the chapter gets right and what it misses is exactly what the book exists to invite.
Institutional advisory inquiries. See Engage with the project for the engagement profile. A 1–2 paragraph description of the institutional context, the question, and the timeline is the right level of detail to start.
Commercial licensing inquiries. Where the work fits inside a commercial product, the licence page describes the licensing structure.

What’s not useful

Identity speculation, even sympathetic. Publishing it harms the pseudonymous discipline that makes the book possible.
Requests to write commentary in other publications under any byline. The pseudonym does not extend to syndicated commentary; the project is this site only.
Requests for endorsement or co-signing of policy positions. The book takes the position that the structural-diagnosis questions exist and should be discussed; it does not endorse specific institutional or political answers.